Previous

Rising Probate Disputes in 2026

Probate disputes are rising across the UK - one 2026 case saw 8 years of litigation consume nearly half a £600,000 estate in fees. This piece explores why disputes are increasing and how inheritance funding eases beneficiaries' strain.

Family home caught in a contested probate dispute in the UK
Written by Terence Kalombo Growth Analyst

Rising Probate Disputes in 2026: Why Families Need Better Financial Planning

Last updated: July 2026

Nobody Wins When the Family Feuds

In April 2026, Robert Chung stood outside Central London County Court having spent eight years fighting his siblings over a £600,000 estate. The three-bedroom family home in South Woodford should have been straightforward to divide between three children, but instead became the subject of a costly legal battle that consumed nearly half its value in legal fees and occupation charges.

By the time Recorder McDonald delivered his judgment, Chung faced a £265,000 bill. His siblings walked away with less than they would have received if the estate had been distributed without litigation. The court’s own verdict was stark: this was a tragedy, not a victory for anyone involved.

This case is not an anomaly. It is a symptom of something larger that the probate sector must confront: disputes are rising, litigation is becoming more common, and beneficiaries are bearing the cost.

The Numbers

The Chung case teaches several hard lessons about modern probate administration, with the cost of dispute coming first. When Irene Chung died intestate in 2016, her estate passed to her three children. As Recorder McDonald noted:

Had the estate been distributed without litigation, each sibling would have received an equal share. Chung had been offered a settlement that would have granted him a 62.5% share of the property’s value. Instead, the claimant’s pursuit of sole ownership likely exhausted his entitlement through legal costs and occupation charges.

Recorder McDonald

Second, the time cost. Eight years, though at the extreme, is not unusual in contested probate matters. During that time, beneficiaries are frozen out of their inheritance. They cannot access capital for inheritance tax bills, funeral expenses, estate administration costs, or even basic personal needs. The estate sits in limbo, generating costs rather than providing relief.

Third, the human cost. Families fracture as sibling relationships that might have been salvageable become irreversible. The three Chung children, who should have united over their parents’ legacy, instead became adversaries in a courtroom.

Why Probate Disputes Are Rising

The probate sector has observed a pattern in recent years. More estates are contested. More families are litigating. The reasons are multifaceted but instructive.

Many estates lack clear documentation. Irene Chung died without an executed will. Verbal promises, supposed deathbed conversations, and unclear intentions create the conditions for dispute. Beneficiaries rely on testimony that is inherently fragile. Courts struggle to determine what was said, what was promised, and what was intended without contemporaneous written evidence.

Others stem from blended families, complex financial arrangements, or ambiguous language in wills. Some arise from beneficiaries who genuinely believe they have a claim, leading them to pursue litigation even when the evidence is weak.

What unites these cases is the toll they extract. Litigation is expensive. Probate fees, solicitor costs, barrister fees, court costs, and expert witness fees can easily exceed £50,000 to £150,000 in contested matters. For smaller estates, this represents an outsized proportion of the available assets.

The Chung case is instructive precisely because it shows what happens when these costs accumulate over years of dispute.

The Missing Piece: Financial Support During Probate

Here is the critical gap that the probate sector has yet to fully address: what happens to beneficiaries who need access to capital while probate is ongoing or contested?

In the Chung case, imagine if the beneficiaries could have accessed their estimated inheritance share through an inheritance advance. Each sibling might have received provisional distributions or advances against their anticipated share. This would have reduced the pressure to litigate, provided immediate relief from financial stress, and allowed family members to pursue their separate interests rather than remain locked in dispute.

Instead, they waited eight years. During that time, they could not pay inheritance tax. They could not cover funeral expenses. They could not settle their own personal debts. They were hostages to the legal process. This is the hidden human cost of probate disputes that the industry rarely discusses. Beneficiaries are not just waiting for their inheritance — they are often suffering real financial hardship while waiting.

For executors and administrators, the burden is equally severe. They must manage the estate, deal with creditors, manage the property, and navigate disputes, all while holding assets that beneficiaries desperately need access to.

How Inheritance Funding Bridges the Gap

Inheritance advance & Tax products address this gap directly. By providing immediate liquidity against an anticipated inheritance share, they offer several key benefits:

Immediate Decrease in Financial Pressure

A beneficiary can access capital to cover pressing needs — funeral expenses, an inheritance tax loan, legal fees, estate administration costs, or personal debts that have accumulated during or even before the probate process. Once relieved, this may resolve the underlying dispute.

Relief for Beneficiaries Not Party to the Dispute

When one beneficiary contests a will, everyone else’s inheritance gets frozen along with it, regardless of whether they have any stake in the disagreement. With 41% of practitioners reporting an increase in disputes involving blended or modern families, it’s increasingly common for one contested claim to hold up distribution for several unrelated beneficiaries at once. Inheritance funding gives those uninvolved parties a way to access their expected share while the dispute plays out elsewhere, rather than being drawn into someone else’s fight simply by being named in the same will.

Protection Against Further Deterioration

In the Chung case, the property sat unoccupied and unmaintained for years while litigation proceeded. Inheritance funding allows estates to be managed and maintained more effectively while probate completes.

Peace of Mind

For beneficiaries facing a wait of months or years, the certainty of accessing a portion of their inheritance removes one major source of stress.

Lessons for Will Writers and Estate Planners

The rise in probate disputes points to several actionable recommendations for practitioners.

First, emphasise proper documentation. The most preventable disputes arise from unclear wills, missing documentation, or verbal promises that cannot be substantiated. A clearly written, properly executed will with explicit instructions eliminates a vast category of potential disputes. Equally important is a documented capacity check at the time of signing, ideally involving a medical professional or solicitor’s notes on the testator’s mental state, since disputes over testamentary capacity are among the most common grounds for challenging a will after death, and having that evidence on file at the outset can prevent a claim from ever gaining traction.

Second, discuss intentions openly with families. If a testator plans to leave assets unequally, or if there are conditions attached to inheritance, these should be communicated clearly to beneficiaries beforehand and placed in the will, alongside supporting documents such as a letter of wishes. Surprises in probate almost always lead to disputes.

Third, recognise that some beneficiaries will face hardship during probate, particularly if probate is delayed or contested. Be prepared to discuss inheritance funding options with your clients. Not all beneficiaries will benefit from it, but knowing that the option exists allows you to advise comprehensively.

Fourth, consider the role of executors and administrators. Poor executor communication is often a source of dispute. Ensure that your clients understand the importance of keeping beneficiaries informed, providing regular updates, and addressing concerns promptly.

The Path Forward

The Chung case represents a worst-case scenario, but it is not unique. As estate values rise, family structures become more complex, and beneficiaries become more aware of their rights, disputes are likely to continue rising.

The probate sector should continue to evolve its approach to supporting beneficiaries. This means better education about the importance of will documentation, clearer communication between executors and beneficiaries, and financial tools that reduce the pressure that drives litigation. Inheritance advance products are part of this ecosystem. They do not solve poor planning or prevent family disputes entirely, but they can address a genuine gap: the financial hardship that beneficiaries face when probate is delayed or contested.

The Chung family could not change the past. But beneficiaries in the future can avoid similar tragedies by planning properly and having access to the right financial tools when probate does not go smoothly.


About the Author
The Level Group is an FCA-authorised specialist lender focused on probate and family law finance. We provide Inheritance Advance Loans, IHT Loans, Estate Expense Loans, and Family Law Loans to support beneficiaries and estate professionals through complex probate administration. Learn more at thelevelgroup.co.uk.

Interested in applying for funding?

Apply now using the button below. A member of the team will review your information and arrange a time to speak with you.

Apply for funding today
Speak to us today
020 7205 2870